I found the problem: the pseudopotential I was using isn't good for these titanates, according to the Troullier-Martins PSP README:
http://www.abinit.org/downloads/psp-links/lda_tm_psp1_data
Thanks for the help everyone.
(And I did need to increase ecut to 30 Ha or so)
Search found 4 matches
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 9:49 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4365
- Sat Nov 13, 2010 7:30 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4365
Re: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
The system is a cubic perovskite ... the following code takes about 10 minutes. The SCF iterations converge. udtset 1 1 ndtset 1 # Definition of the unit cell acell 3*7.6707 rprim # a cubic unit cell 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 # Definition of the atom types ntypat 3 znucl 38 22 8 # strontium (38), titanium (...
- Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:38 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4365
Re: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
I used prtkpt to choose a better k-grid and now it is off by 4%. I suppose I need to run the calculation longer.
- Wed Nov 10, 2010 9:22 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
- Replies: 5
- Views: 4365
Relaxed unit cell off by 6%
I am doing a ground state calc using "ionmov 2" to relax the geometry. When I do this, the forces vanish (fcart is 0.00000000d0) for acell about 6% different from what other LDA papers get/experimental value. I do not think it is due to ecut/nkpt since the forces are zero. Could this be du...