Hi all,
it's very strange that the hdf small version is not backwards compatible. I have encountered the same thing on an old cluster of ours with the (new) hdf 1.12 and netcdf 4.7.4. They should ensure API and binary compatibility at least until version 2!
Search found 611 matches
- Mon May 03, 2021 5:30 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: Running Abinit in virtual box Ubuntu [SOLVED]
- Replies: 5
- Views: 24191
- Fri Nov 06, 2020 3:28 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Atomic Coordinates for nanowires
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9241
Re: Atomic Coordinates for nanowires
Hello Nedhal, So, the general idea is ok. However you need to worry about the following things: - abinit is a periodic plane wave code, so you need PBC with vacuum perpendicular to the wire and to find a periodic slice of the wire along the axis. You will need to ensure the atom positions and "c" la...
- Tue Oct 27, 2020 11:43 pm
- Forum: Configuring and compiling ABINIT
- Topic: gfortran complex/real cast complaint [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 25167
gfortran complex/real cast complaint [SOLVED]
Hello all, my new version of gfortran (10.2.0) complains with an error when I compile abinit, due to simultaneous casts that it recognizes passing the same variable (real or complex) to a routine that only expects one of the 2 types (even if the latter is outside its scope, like a lapack/blas call)....
- Mon Aug 31, 2020 10:32 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20850
Re: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
PS: see https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1 ... /14/13/302 for instance for the spontaneous polarization of GaN
- Mon Aug 31, 2020 6:00 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Relax structure at finite electric field [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 18794
Re: Relax structure at finite electric field [SOLVED]
Hi Daosheng, this gets a bit technical. The electrical displacement D you probably know about (berryopt 16), and you'll have to read the supplementary of Stengel's paper to grasp the difference for the reduced stuff. Or just trust them and use berryopt 14 (which is what I would do)! The issue is wit...
- Mon Aug 31, 2020 5:44 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20850
Re: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
Hi again Doasheng, ok, so the warning is not the problem, the output is. It's very strange that the dielectric constant comes out ok (you get it from the P(E) curve?) but the Z* not... Can you compare the P(E) in the ncpp and PAW cases, as well as the P(R) ones? Could it be you are not in the linear...
- Sun Aug 30, 2020 8:47 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
- Replies: 6
- Views: 20850
Re: Berry phase_new warning [SOLVED]
Hello Daosheng, 1) a few checks first: have you done DFPT calculations of the Born charges? And have you tried norm conserving psp (see pseudo-dojo.org) for the Berry phase version? The former will give you a baseline and is less prone to instabilities, and the latter will tell you if it's a PAW pro...
- Wed Aug 12, 2020 3:08 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Lambda and Tc values are too small
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9488
Re: Lambda and Tc values are too small
Also, 12 12 4 is a bit coarse. Even if your system has a large unit cell, unfortunately, the k grid convergence can be quite slow
- Wed Aug 12, 2020 3:07 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Lambda and Tc values are too small
- Replies: 2
- Views: 9488
Re: Lambda and Tc values are too small
Hello, we have seen similar effects with some compounds. I think it is due to a rough interpolation of the EPC at low q and omega, which makes the a2F function too large at low w. This unbalances the calculation of omega_log, which is the large lambda limiting maximal value of Tc. Could you post ome...
- Fri Jun 19, 2020 2:10 pm
- Forum: Improving ABINIT
- Topic: Possible bug(s) in m_krank/krank_new time reversal options
- Replies: 1
- Views: 9756
Re: Possible bug(s) in m_krank/krank_new time reversal options
Brilliant! Thank you - we were about to start debugging this. I will test it immediately
It should be in v9.2 if everything goes smoothly
Best
Matthieu
It should be in v9.2 if everything goes smoothly
Best
Matthieu
- Sun Feb 09, 2020 12:33 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Determining xred, rprim, and shiftk
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3766
Re: Determining xred, rprim, and shiftk
Hello Erichmond, prt1dm simply does a sum over grid points along 2 directions, divides by the number of points per plane, and prints the result. If your lattice vectors are not orthogonal this is probably not the projection you would expect, but still useful to get an idea. If they are orthogonal to...
- Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:55 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5604
Re: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
Use spinmagtarget, it's easiest.
Do you confirm your system is insulating? Otherwise there is no point...
Do you confirm your system is insulating? Otherwise there is no point...
- Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:53 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: eph calcualtion of hexagonal graphene
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4770
Re: eph calcualtion of hexagonal graphene
Hello again (been a while), 1) I hope you are looking for the electronic part of kappa, that is all the epc and anaddb will get you 2) for Si, there is a gap, so nothing will come out, idem for undoped graphene as the DOS is 0 3) your files are identical but contain huge numbers 1.e309! This seems a...
- Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:15 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5604
Re: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
NL/Raman will only work for insulators. If your FM system is really insulating, you should be able to run with occopt 1. Recent versions of abinit should allow for metallic occopt as well (presuming the user knows what she is doing), but I'm not sure this was merged into the public branch yet. Which...
- Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:09 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: electron phonon coupling strength
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2797
Re: electron phonon coupling strength
Hello, the easiest is in the log and main output file, if you look for the lambda averaged isotropic ep coupling strength. The A2F files contain the Eliashberg spectral function, which is frequency resolved, to show which phonons contribute to the epc, and lambda is the first inverse momend of a2F. ...
- Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:04 pm
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Convergence problem
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20884
Re: Convergence problem
Dear mverstra Thank you very much. I konw the renson of the error.I don't have storage space for caculating.I want to get the ddb.file to compute the elastic constanr and piezoelectric constant.There are two warning in my out.file --------------------------------------------------------------------...
- Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:00 pm
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Convergence problem
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20884
Re: Convergence problem
I used the ddb.file to compute elastic constant and piezoelectric constant.The warning appear ddb_piezo : WARNING - Acoustic sum rule violation met : the eigenvalues of accoustic mode are too large at Gamma point Increase cutoff energy or k-points sampling. The three eigenvalues are: 2.438948E-05 -...
- Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:02 am
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Convergence problem
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20884
Re: Convergence problem
hello again, the input file is a good start, but it is still not clear to me exactly what you are calculating and especially when (which dataset, at which step) it is stopping. You are using PAW? I am not sure if all of the alchemical stuff is implemented, and in particular for DFPT. Is it crashing ...
- Sun Apr 14, 2019 10:44 pm
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Convergence problem
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20884
Re: Convergence problem
which two datasets? In general the elastic constants and all DFPT is more sensitive to ecut and nkpt than the ground state is. You have to re-check in detail. The ease of convergence depends more on having a delicate system which is magnetic or close to a metal-insulator transition, or very anisotro...
- Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:43 pm
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Convergence problem
- Replies: 13
- Views: 20884
Re: Convergence problem
Hello, you are converging, but badly and slowly. You can add more iterations, more empty bands, and you can try to use metallic occupations (occopt 7 for example) with a very small smearing width. This makes the convergence easier, even for insulators. Your post is not clear about which dataset is c...
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 4:24 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: eph calcualtion of hexagonal graphene
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4770
Re: eph calcualtion of hexagonal graphene
It runs for me... Check that * all of the GKK files are there and complete, then * that they are included in the merge for mrggkk, and that * you do _not_ include the GKK files from the DDK (following?) in the main GKK file with the epc matrix elements. These files should be listed (just the names) ...
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 3:52 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: DFPT [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7241
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 2:05 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Error message for double definition of tolXXX [SOLVED]
- Replies: 0
- Views: 24220
Error message for double definition of tolXXX [SOLVED]
This is copied from Wofferman - please make separate posts for each topic. The short answer is, this is not a bug, simply the error message is not easy to see or find if you run in parallel. This is inevitable - the test is done at the right time and the error message is clear, but in parallel on a ...
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:54 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: IFC and unit of freq in PHDOS
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3945
Re: IFC and unit of freq in PHDOS
Regarding the output units, you are correct that they are not implemented systematically. Some files, but mainly the output+log were implemented a long time ago, and more recent developments (probably the PHDOS file as well) are only in Hartree a.u. This is not a big deal to post-process, and the ma...
- Mon Apr 01, 2019 1:46 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: DFPT [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 7241
Re: DFPT [SOLVED]
See, e.g. eq 61 in
http://iffwww.iff.kfa-juelich.de/~wortm ... l45/C2.pdf
There is a sum evaluated over the different born charges projected on the TO mode you want to renormalize. The change is non-analytical in the sense that it depends on which direction your q vector points when you take the limit q -> 0 (discontinuous at Gamma).
http://iffwww.iff.kfa-juelich.de/~wortm ... l45/C2.pdf
There is a sum evaluated over the different born charges projected on the TO mode you want to renormalize. The change is non-analytical in the sense that it depends on which direction your q vector points when you take the limit q -> 0 (discontinuous at Gamma).