Search found 10 matches
- Mon Aug 15, 2016 6:01 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: outvar_i_n : Printing only first 50 k-points.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3793
Re: outvar_i_n : Printing only first 50 k-points.
Thanks a lot Eric.
- Thu Aug 11, 2016 12:01 pm
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16771
Re: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
Hi Mohamed. look in the end of your AgN3.out.in file attached (11.36 KiB). DATABASE KEY: ecut: 40.0 natom: = = 8 nband: 27.0 occopt: = = toldfe: 0.0 toldff: 0.0 tolvrs: 0.0 tolwfr: 1e-12 typat: 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 reciprocalvectors: 0.0 0.0884912 0.0882256 0.0944959 0.0 0.0882256 0.0944959 0.0884912 0.0...
- Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:54 am
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16771
Re: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
Hi Vladimir, Actually to fix this error here is a simple trick that ... I suggest modifying the "AbinitBandStructureMaker.py" file by removing the float before the starter. It works well with me Mohamed Yousef Hassan, EEE department, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore. Hi Mohamed...
- Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:52 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: outvar_i_n : Printing only first 50 k-points.
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3793
outvar_i_n : Printing only first 50 k-points.
Hi, all.
I found that only first 50 k-points printing in the log file. How can I override this statement? I want print all points.
Best. Vladimir.
I found that only first 50 k-points printing in the log file. How can I override this statement? I want print all points.
Best. Vladimir.
- Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:28 am
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
- Replies: 9
- Views: 16771
Re: Problem with ABINITBandStructureMaker
I've got another issue: ABINITBandStructureMaker can't parse the input file with 2 datasets. traceback ========================================= AbinitBandStructureMaker.py version 1.3 ========================================= 2 dataset(s) detected Which dataset(s) do you want to use (1 to 2) ? 2 Tr...
- Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:35 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5593
Re: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
To start with a new geometry is necessary not only to copy new acell but also new xred.
thanks to Jordan for helpful discussions
how to add [SOLVED] to the subj?
thanks to Jordan for helpful discussions
how to add [SOLVED] to the subj?
- Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:39 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5593
Re: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
Hello Jordan. Thanks for the advice. 1. criteria for the relaxation is default tolmxf= 5.0000E-05 2. ngfft is 90 90 90 and ngfftdg is 120 125 125 in both run. I think that I have faced a bad SCF convergence. In both cases at first, we find a false SCF minimum, and then the real one. Whether it is po...
- Tue Jul 19, 2016 10:49 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5593
Re: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
I'am restarting from optimized geometry and WFN, the graph demonstrate it.
- Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:54 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5593
Restarting from the same WFN didn't got the same energy
I'm in trouble to optimize geometry of AgN3 (silver azide). Using different PP (LDA FHI, GGA FHI, HGH NC, GGA PBE) I optimized the geometry with (optcell=1 or optcell=2), but when I restart optimization from optimized acell and WFN (with irdwfk 1 keyword) I've got different energy from previously op...
- Sun Jun 05, 2016 5:29 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Geometry Constraints for Selected Atoms
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4673
Re: Geometry Constraints for Selected Atoms
Hi, all.
I want to optimize geometry of some metal azides (KN3, AgN3, etc.)
It is obvious that the NN distance and NNN angle must be kept in the geometry optimization of the cell.
whether it is possible to set such constrains?
Best.
Vladimir.
I want to optimize geometry of some metal azides (KN3, AgN3, etc.)
It is obvious that the NN distance and NNN angle must be kept in the geometry optimization of the cell.
whether it is possible to set such constrains?
Best.
Vladimir.