Search found 268 matches
- Wed May 03, 2017 11:21 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: How to relax atomic systems in only one direction? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3839
Re: How to relax atomic systems in only one direction? [SOLVED]
Dear Visum, Yes, there is. Please, look at the variables http://www.abinit.org/doc/helpfiles/for-v8.2/input_variables/html_automatically_generated/varrlx.html#natfixx http://www.abinit.org/doc/helpfiles/for-v8.2/input_variables/html_automatically_generated/varrlx.html#iatfixx and similar for other d...
- Thu Apr 13, 2017 9:02 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Visualizing
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2648
Re: Visualizing
Dear Fatemeh,
You can use cut3D utility provided in your abinit package. It will format your density file for specific usage (you choose from the list). Then you can plot it. I usually use gnuplot or Wolfram Mathematica.
Best regards,
Igor
You can use cut3D utility provided in your abinit package. It will format your density file for specific usage (you choose from the list). Then you can plot it. I usually use gnuplot or Wolfram Mathematica.
Best regards,
Igor
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:51 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: How to vary distance between two atoms out of many
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2001
Re: How to vary distance between two atoms out of many
Dear Mawla, Well, this is more a geometry question rather than abinit. I don't think you can change one Pd-Si distance without changing the other Pd-Si distances or the Si-Si distances in the same time. So, you will have to choose which one of these suits you the most. The pyramid volume will change...
- Thu Apr 06, 2017 8:36 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: How to relax only neighboring atoms [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4032
Re: How to relax only neighboring atoms [SOLVED]
Dear Mawla,
You can use 'natfix' and 'iatfix' variables to specify exactly which atoms you want to fix. The ones you do not specify will be relaxed.
Best regards,
Igor
You can use 'natfix' and 'iatfix' variables to specify exactly which atoms you want to fix. The ones you do not specify will be relaxed.
Best regards,
Igor
- Tue Mar 21, 2017 8:13 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: InGaSb properties
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2889
Re: InGaSb properties
I cannot see any problem in your files file. How do you know that you have a problem? Do you get some kind of error in the log file?
- Mon Mar 20, 2017 8:17 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: InGaSb properties
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2889
Re: InGaSb properties
Dear Uness,
Please, refer first to the Tutorials given on the abinit web
http://www.abinit.org/doc/helpfiles/for-v8.2/tutorial/welcome.html
After that you might have some specific questions, which can be more easily answered.
Best regards,
Igor
Please, refer first to the Tutorials given on the abinit web
http://www.abinit.org/doc/helpfiles/for-v8.2/tutorial/welcome.html
After that you might have some specific questions, which can be more easily answered.
Best regards,
Igor
- Fri Mar 17, 2017 8:25 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: GaAs wurtzite
- Replies: 21
- Views: 27952
Re: GaAs wurtzite
Dear shalom, As everyone else who started using abinit, you should first and foremost read the abinit specific documentation available on the web site. After that, before starting to calculate your system(s), you should go through the first 4 tutorials (more if you have time). There you will find mo...
- Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:56 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: SCF convergence problem in vacancy defect modelling
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4139
Re: SCF convergence problem in vacancy defect modelling
Dear Maki,
Did you try increasing some of these variables: npulayit, nnsclo or nline in combination with iscf 7 or 17?
Best regards,
Igor
Did you try increasing some of these variables: npulayit, nnsclo or nline in combination with iscf 7 or 17?
Best regards,
Igor
- Wed Dec 14, 2016 8:53 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4443
Re: how to constrain magnetization in ABINIT? [SOLVED]
Dear ucsdmavrl, For magconon 1, you constrain only the direction of a vector, while its size will be left open for 'relaxation' during the energy minimization. For magconon 2, you constrain both the direction and the size of the vector, and the energy is minimized under both of these conditions. The...
- Thu Dec 01, 2016 8:51 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Applying strain on a 2 D material [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4254
Re: Applying strain on a 2 D material [SOLVED]
Dear manik, 1. It seems that you misunderstood something. Strain concerns the deformation of lattice (through rprim variable), not atomic positions (xcart). If you followed the elastic response function tutorial at http://www.abinit.org/doc/helpfiles/for-v8.0/tutorial/lesson_elastic.html#4 you could...
- Tue Nov 22, 2016 8:13 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Wrong PDOS for NiTi [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 5196
Re: Wrong PDOS for NiTi [SOLVED]
Dear disae, 1. First, this is not phonon DOS, but phonon dispersion curves. 2. The differences you see can be the result of many factors: approximation used in the calculation, unconverged calculation parameters, unrelaxed structure, and similar. There are many things you should check first, before ...
- Tue Oct 18, 2016 8:53 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: doping changes the space group symmetry [SOLVED]
- Replies: 3
- Views: 5568
Re: doping changes the space group symmetry [SOLVED]
Dear Espiridion, With doping you are changing the symmetry of the structure (the original atom is replaced by the dopant). So, naturally, the space group changes. If you already knew that, maybe you could "hack" abinit or some parts of it to keep the symmetry. But some of the elders will k...
- Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:26 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: fatbands for ncpp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4241
Re: fatbands for ncpp
I don't know if there is a variable which will 'directly' give you the atom species decomposed DOS. Some of the 'elders' probably know better. I do it by using prtdos 3 to obtain the l decomposed DOS for each atom. Then I add all the l contribution for each atom and get what you asked for. Expect 'e...
- Mon Sep 12, 2016 9:02 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: fatbands for ncpp
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4241
Re: fatbands for ncpp
Hi!
You can do it yourself using Xmgrace, for example. You just plot the contribution as errors represented as symbol sizes.
Best regards,
Igor
You can do it yourself using Xmgrace, for example. You just plot the contribution as errors represented as symbol sizes.
Best regards,
Igor
- Fri Sep 02, 2016 8:46 am
- Forum: Other tools and postprocessing in ABINIT
- Topic: Free Energies from ANADDB [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4950
Re: Free Energies from ANADDB [SOLVED]
Dear ckunka, Indeed, you cannot obtain thermal properties from this kind of calculation. It calculates only the phonons at the Gamma point, which is not enough. For the thermal properties one need the phonon DOS, and for that one needs to sample the phonons throughout the BZ (as in RF2 tutorial). Th...
- Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:36 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: pseudopotentials for graphene
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6498
Re: pseudopotentials for graphene
Hi!
Since you have about a zillion reference to compare to
, the best way would be to test several pseudopotentials, available at the abinit web site, and see which one agrees the best (with those references) concerning the property you are interested in.
Best regards,
Igor
Since you have about a zillion reference to compare to

Best regards,
Igor
- Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:43 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Raman spectrum
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4226
Re: Raman spectrum
Hi! In these two papers, for example, you can find the procedure how to calculate Raman spectrum from the Abinit output data. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 33, L12S05, doi:10.1029/2006GL025736, 2006 PRB 71, 214307 (2005) There's a lot of post-processing involved. And have in mind that only inte...
- Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:42 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11045
Re: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
If you obtained the required pressure at the end of the 1st dataset of your RF calculation, then you are using the correct wavefunction. But since your frequencies are still negative, it means that there is a physical problem in the simulated system taking into account the used approximations (xc, p...
- Wed Mar 16, 2016 1:26 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11045
Re: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
Very much possible. It is known that in some systems phonon frequencies become imaginary at high pressures. You could have the same situation. Try to solve first the problem of different pressures in relaxation and RF calculations. If all you input variables are the same, then you should get the sam...
- Wed Mar 16, 2016 12:56 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11045
Re: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
That might be the source of your problem.
Did you insert the relaxed acell into your RF input file? I see from the inputs your provided in your first post that the acell in the RF input file is the same as in the relaxation input file. If you used that RF input file, you should change acell.
Igor
Did you insert the relaxed acell into your RF input file? I see from the inputs your provided in your first post that the acell in the RF input file is the same as in the relaxation input file. If you used that RF input file, you should change acell.
Igor
- Tue Mar 15, 2016 8:41 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
- Replies: 11
- Views: 11045
Re: something wrong with the phonon caused imaginary freq
Hi! 1] Before anything else, you have to make sure that all common variables have the same values in both calculations. And I can see that some of them do not, like ngkpt, etc. Also it is advised to use the same energy tolerance criterion, while you use toldff in the relaxation and tolvrs in RF. Bec...
- Wed Jan 27, 2016 8:39 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: ngkpt convergence
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2346
Re: ngkpt convergence
Hi! All obtained values should be compared with the most converged one. In your case with the one for mesh 14x14x1. If you take the usual Etot tolerance of 5x10^(-4) Ha, then your converged value would be the one for 7x7x1. The only question remains is whether 14x14x1 is a completely converged mesh....
- Mon Nov 16, 2015 8:08 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: InAs band structure
- Replies: 18
- Views: 25108
Re: InAs band structure
Hi!
1] What do you mean by converged the lattice parameters?
2] It looks like typical bands obtained with unconverged ecut and/or ngkpt. Did you converge the energy bands wrt these two parameters?
Best regards,
Igor
1] What do you mean by converged the lattice parameters?
2] It looks like typical bands obtained with unconverged ecut and/or ngkpt. Did you converge the energy bands wrt these two parameters?
Best regards,
Igor
- Thu Nov 12, 2015 8:34 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: GaAs wurtzite
- Replies: 21
- Views: 27952
Re: GaAs wurtzite
Hi! This is what one can find on abinit input variables part of the web Alternatively to rprim, directions of dimensionless primitive vectors can be specified by using the input variable angdeg. This is especially useful for hexagonal lattices (with 120 or 60 degrees angles). Indeed, in order for sy...
- Mon Nov 02, 2015 9:18 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: Problems with tutorial 1 [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5716
Re: Problems with tutorial 1 [SOLVED]
Hi! It's a good idea how to change the distance between the atoms. But you to modify it a little. You lack the increase in 'y' and 'z' coordinates (xcart+). So, what you need is xcart: -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 xcart+ 0.025 0.0 0.0 But even this way you wouldn't obtain what you wanted, since this wil...