Dear Ajit,
The combination of GW and PAW in abinit is not fully working.
if you need PAW, you have to resort to GPAW or VASP.
Bests
LUCA
Search found 14 matches
- Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:57 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: e-e calculation using GW
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3121
- Sat Feb 11, 2017 2:07 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: In GW, why is VASP faster? How can Abinit beat VASP in GW?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3339
Re: In GW, why is VASP faster? How can Abinit beat VASP in G
Dear Dominic, In order to gain speed when using abinit, you have to compile it with mpiifort compiler and mkl libraries. Furthermore, it could be possible that VASP has a better symmetry detection, and hence only for a smaller number of k points QP energies are calculated. If you are interested in f...
- Sat Dec 31, 2016 1:47 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: input files for dft+u with paw for molecule
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2056
Re: input files for dft+u with paw for molecule
Dear mina, your input is correct, but i think that you have to further increase acell up to 60 angstrom in each direction in order to eliminate artificial screening from periodic images to a large extent, in particular as you have a relatively heavy element such as Co. I suggest you to resort to Qua...
- Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:17 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: GW band structure
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3029
Re: GW band structure
Never tried this with abinit but you can do it with yambo.
LUCA
LUCA
- Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:15 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: YAMBO vs ABINIT?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2920
Re: YAMBO vs ABINIT?
Please be a bit more specific, what are the differences ? In peak intensities or positions or both ?
Are the differences large or small ?
LUCA
Are the differences large or small ?
LUCA
- Mon Aug 29, 2016 11:14 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Exciton binding energy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4221
Re: Exciton binding energy
There are many examples in many papers regarding exciton binding energies. Just look at LiF, for instance. or BSE application on other simple systems.
LUCA
LUCA
- Thu Aug 25, 2016 12:12 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Exciton binding energy
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4221
Re: Exciton binding energy
Exciton binding energy of the state #i = Band gap - Excitation energy of the state #i
LUCA
LUCA
- Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:58 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: pseudopotentials for graphene
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6498
Re: pseudopotentials for graphene
Just look at the pseudo potential parameters and you will know the differences in its construction.
LUCA
LUCA
- Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:16 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12007
Re: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
It is easy to verify whether the intraband contributions are contained in the screening or not by just comparing to the results obtained for a well known metal example. Just try "add_chi0_intraband=.TRUE." and look what happens. I never check it. Intraband contributions are always band str...
- Sun Jul 17, 2016 4:09 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: what are the correct GW energies [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4484
Re: what are the correct GW energies [SOLVED]
E(N)_pert is the pertubatively calculated quasi particle energies at the N-th iteration step and the column E(N)_diago is the exact quasi particle energy (at the N-th iteration step) by performing an exact diagonalization of the subspace of quasi particle Hamiltonian. Example : Band E_lda <Vxclda> E...
- Sun Jul 17, 2016 3:46 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12007
Re: Intraband Contribution to Screening File
Intraband contributions are important in case of metals for which you need a very very dense k-grid (18x18X18) to obtain converged results.
For semi conductors and insulators intraband transitions are absent.
LUCA
For semi conductors and insulators intraband transitions are absent.
LUCA
- Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:39 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: GW corrections for anti-ferromagnetic materials
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3321
GW corrections for anti-ferromagnetic materials
Dear all,
I am trying to calculate GW corrections for an anti-ferromagnetic material, but obtain :
Is there any way to circumvent Shubnikov ?
Bests
L.
I am trying to calculate GW corrections for an anti-ferromagnetic material, but obtain :
Code: Select all
--- !ERROR
message: |
Shubnikov type III not implemented
src_file: m_chi0.F90
src_line: 1245
...
Is there any way to circumvent Shubnikov ?
Bests
L.
- Wed Mar 16, 2016 5:36 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: non local part of the pseudo potential ..
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3846
Re: non local part of the pseudo potential ..
Dear Matteo,
many thanks.
Will abinit8 be realeased soon ?
Bests
L.
many thanks.
Will abinit8 be realeased soon ?
Bests
L.
- Tue Mar 15, 2016 3:12 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: non local part of the pseudo potential ..
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3846
non local part of the pseudo potential ..
Dear all,
Is there any way of disabling non-local part of the pseudo potential in the calculation of screening ?
I would like to jump this term : limit q->0, including term <n,k|[Vnl,iqr]|n"k> .
Bests
LUCA
Is there any way of disabling non-local part of the pseudo potential in the calculation of screening ?
I would like to jump this term : limit q->0, including term <n,k|[Vnl,iqr]|n"k> .
Bests
LUCA