Dear Eric,
Thanks for helping report the issue. I look forward the upcoming update.
Best wishes,
Andy
Search found 43 matches
- Fri Dec 04, 2020 7:02 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
- Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:31 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Dear Eric, I have tested the nbands from 35 to 95 with 10 nbands increase every time. Seems like the issue still remains. Also, I have tested the relativity high energy cutoff with the PAW dataset (up to 45 Ha with pawecutdg=90) The problem still exists. And there is something that might help. I jus...
- Sat Nov 14, 2020 2:46 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Dear Eric, Some update.. Same divergence happened even when I use the Atomic PAW from GPAW https://wiki.fysik.dtu.dk/gpaw/setups/setups.html So I think this might be the bug for the PAW+DFPT calculation? However, In another case SnO2 rutile, the PAW + DFPT working well. So, form my perspective, eith...
- Fri Nov 13, 2020 5:58 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Dear Eric, No matter I use high or low tsmear (0.0001 to 0.1). the divergence will happened. Also, I have tried the GBRV PAW data set before, but the GRBV PAW data set doesn't include the spin polarize info in their dataset, so I wonder if that may cause the problem? All the ground state converged h...
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 9:14 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Dear Eric, Sorry for the late response. Thanks for suggesting that the tsmear might be large for my calculation. However, the divergence also happened when I use the occopt=1 with spinmagntarget = 0 to define the AFM polarize for my system. I wonder if it is the PAW's problem or there are some sort ...
- Wed Nov 04, 2020 9:08 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: "ug for (band, ik_ibz, spin): not stored in memory" ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 12367
Re: "ug for (band, ik_ibz, spin): not stored in memory" ?
Dear Users,
I also met this problem in 9.2.1 version.
Is this still an issue?
Regards,
Andy
I also met this problem in 9.2.1 version.
Is this still an issue?
Regards,
Andy
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 9:39 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Dear Eric, The system is CrI3 monolayer but the error is the same, which is the weird divergence when doing perturbation. I have test for both GGA and LDA with JTH-LDA-atomicdata-1.1 I have no idea what is causing the problem. Here is my input (I was still using the files file in 9.2.1 LUL) In my in...
- Mon Nov 02, 2020 3:59 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
- Replies: 15
- Views: 21518
Re: Strange divergence in phonon calculation
Hi,
I met the same problem in the latest product version 9.2.1
Is there any suggestion or information about this error?
I was using the newest JTH PSP from the Abinit site.
Regards,
Andy
I met the same problem in the latest product version 9.2.1
Is there any suggestion or information about this error?
I was using the newest JTH PSP from the Abinit site.
Regards,
Andy
- Sun Sep 13, 2020 6:03 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Negative frequency with denser q-points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21095
Re: Negative frequency with denser q-points
Dear Lily you can grep the eigenvector with the corresponding mode and use xcrysden or VESTA to check the vibration mode. In my experiment, LDA usually perform better with DFPT method (I have no idea why is that a case...) So it's not surprising that you said changing to LDA will fix the negative fr...
- Sat Sep 05, 2020 9:10 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Negative frequency with denser q-points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21095
Re: Negative frequency with denser q-points
Dear Lily, If the negative frequency is happened at gamma point and you have tested most the converge variables, It might mean that the system is not stable under GGA. The force I mean is that the force acting on each atom. In particular case, reading the force may find something interesting. Have y...
- Fri Sep 04, 2020 11:20 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Negative frequency with denser q-points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21095
Re: Negative frequency with denser q-points
Dear Lily, Here is few comment and question... 1, which q-point you get the negative frequency? One thing you can do is to print out the phonon eigenvector to see which kind of vibration cause the negative frequency (with q-vector, it usually hard to distinguish the vibration symmetry, but still wor...
- Wed Sep 02, 2020 11:39 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Negative frequency with denser q-points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21095
Re: Negative frequency with denser q-points
Dear Lily, You should grep the frequency from the DFPT calculation at each q-point (the abinit output, not the anaddb output) If you are on the linux you can use command to get the frequency calculated form the DFPT at each point: $grep -A 3 cm 'your_result'.out The converge of the vacuum layer shou...
- Sun Aug 30, 2020 8:24 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Negative frequency with denser q-points
- Replies: 16
- Views: 21095
Re: Negative frequency with denser q-points
Dear lilymali03, Here is my suggestion. in anaddb files, test the phonon dispersion with the variable rifcsph. The variable decide the Radius of the Interatomic Force Constant sphere. If you use the denser q-point, the short range force range is larger. Which might cause some sort of mistake. But th...
- Fri Jul 17, 2020 3:57 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Re: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Dear all,
Another question I wonder,
Is that means it is impossible to calculate the non-linear properites within DFPT method?
or I can just use occopt = 1 for metal? I think it makes wrong since i can not define the fermi level well.
If there are some advise I will be thankful.
Regards,
Andy
Another question I wonder,
Is that means it is impossible to calculate the non-linear properites within DFPT method?
or I can just use occopt = 1 for metal? I think it makes wrong since i can not define the fermi level well.
If there are some advise I will be thankful.
Regards,
Andy
- Sun Apr 26, 2020 9:06 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Re: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Dear Lucas,
Thanks for the info. I'll wait for the good news.
You guys are doing amazing job.
Best wishes,
Andy
Thanks for the info. I'll wait for the good news.
You guys are doing amazing job.
Best wishes,
Andy
- Thu Apr 16, 2020 5:08 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Re: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Dear Eric,
I see. it's unfortunate to know that FM case cannot be done...
Hope that spinmagntarget correction will be include in the future. (or the metallic occupation)
I'll wait the comment form Lucas.
Regards,
Andy
I see. it's unfortunate to know that FM case cannot be done...
Hope that spinmagntarget correction will be include in the future. (or the metallic occupation)
I'll wait the comment form Lucas.
Regards,
Andy
- Thu Apr 09, 2020 3:31 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Re: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Ok. I think i will just wait for the good news
Hope that everything is alright.
Cheers
Andy
Hope that everything is alright.
Cheers
Andy
- Wed Apr 08, 2020 3:53 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Re: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Dear Eric,
Thanks for the reply.
I am looking forward it!
I wonder if there is any other way to set the spin without using spinmagntarget?
Cheers,
Andy
Thanks for the reply.
I am looking forward it!
I wonder if there is any other way to set the spin without using spinmagntarget?
Cheers,
Andy
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:35 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 16288
Re: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
Hi...just some comment and different view I cannot tell if your idea is correct since i am not familiar with the PDOS calculation. But i think you can do the simple test by using the small grid to prove your point. Actually I think that the much lower frequency states is not causing by the missing N...
- Tue Apr 07, 2020 7:11 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6700
Non Linear calculation input for ferromagnetic system
Dear Abinit users The new implementation of DFPT for non-linear response (usepead = 0) works for collinear spin polarized system. but in the test file, all the test of this implementation use the variable spinmagtarget=0. I think for that case, the system must be Anti-ferromagnetic, right? -------- ...
- Tue Mar 31, 2020 4:35 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
- Replies: 5
- Views: 5605
Re: The Raman(NLO) calculation for the ferromagnetic system
Use spinmagtarget, it's easiest. Do you confirm your system is insulating? Otherwise there is no point... Hi I just noticed that abinit release the new version. Just wonderIng is there any other sight or solution to the problem I met? I haven’t try the new version(9.0) yet But I want to make sure i...
- Mon Mar 30, 2020 2:19 pm
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: Pseudopotential file pspxc not equal to input ixc [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15835
Re: Pseudopotential file pspxc not equal to input ixc [SOLVED]
Dear Eric
Thanks for the info.The calculation successes and work perfectly,.
Cheers,
Andy Hsu
Thanks for the info.The calculation successes and work perfectly,.
Cheers,
Andy Hsu
- Wed Mar 25, 2020 3:34 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 16288
Re: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
Hi From my experience, the ngkpt in the main run is okay if it is commensurate to the q-grids. if you want to use the fine k-grid with only 2x2x2 q-grid, I suggest to use integral multiple ngkpt of the q-grids or it might cause the numerically error.(Image that the q-point is not on the k-grid, so t...
- Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:48 pm
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: Pseudopotential file pspxc not equal to input ixc [SOLVED]
- Replies: 2
- Views: 15835
Pseudopotential file pspxc not equal to input ixc [SOLVED]
Hi I was doing some simple test with ABINIT8.10.3 and using the ONCVPSP-PW-PDv0.4 pseudo potentials https://github.com/abinit/pseudo_dojo/tree/master/pseudo_dojo/pseudos And in my calculation, the code says that --- !WARNING src_file: m_pspini.F90 src_line: 1088 message: | Pseudopotential file pspxc...
- Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:40 am
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
- Replies: 19
- Views: 16288
Re: Phonon DOS [SOLVED]
Hi Yes the qph1l list of qpts doesn't need to match the the main run, but the anaddb input ngqpt need to be the q-grid you use. Once you have the information at the q-grid, the rest of the phonon dispersion can be form by the Fourier transform. so you can choose any path in the Brillouin zone to for...