Hi all,
Does anyone know how to plot the exciton wave function? I think the data related to the plot is BSEIG file calculated using bs_algorithm=1. Also, there are some related scripts in scripts/post_processing/bse_hexc/. How to use them?
Search found 14 matches
- Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:19 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Plot exciton wavefunction
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2585
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:42 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculation [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 19233
Re: G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculatio [SOLVED]
This problem may be due to the large anisotropy of my system. I have a very long crystal length. Hello, Does anyone know how to solve the below problem during screening calculation using the gwcomp technique? ''gwcompleteness.F90:149:WARNING Number of G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere for Wfns = 3965...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 5:38 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: BSE wrong dimension error [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3823
Re: BSE wrong dimension error [SOLVED]
This error is due to using the scalapack version of abinit. With lapack, it works. Hello, I am experiencing the following error when I do BSE calculations with model dielectric function. I am using the direct diagonalization method. Anyone knows how to solve the problem? --- !ERROR src_file: m_exc_d...
- Fri Dec 08, 2017 3:21 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: BSE wrong dimension error [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3823
BSE wrong dimension error [SOLVED]
Hello, I am experiencing the following error when I do BSE calculations with model dielectric function. I am using the direct diagonalization method. Anyone knows how to solve the problem? --- !ERROR src_file: m_exc_diago.F90 src_line: 784 mpi_rank: 0 message: | Wrong dimension: read: 964050190 expe...
- Sun May 28, 2017 6:44 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculation [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 19233
Re: G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculatio [SOLVED]
I also tried to increase ecutwfn to 40 and 50 Ha, the number of G1-G2 pairs did decrease, but still a huge number, about 1e+5. Anything else I can try?
- Sat May 27, 2017 11:01 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculation [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 19233
G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere in screening calculation [SOLVED]
Hello, Does anyone know how to solve the below problem during screening calculation using the gwcomp technique? ''gwcompleteness.F90:149:WARNING Number of G1-G2 pairs outside the G-sphere for Wfns = 396572" It is suggested to use either larger ecutwfn or smaller ecuteps to get rid of that. Howe...
- Wed May 24, 2017 4:59 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Print Coulomb Matrix elements
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3488
Re: Print Coulomb Matrix elements
roxM wrote:I am wondering if it is possible to print out the Coulomb matrix elements from a GW calculation. From what I can tell, the W calculation happens in m_screening.F90, but is it written or stored anywhere?
Have you got the answer?
Best,
xW
- Mon May 01, 2017 4:18 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Indices out of boundary when doing screening calculations
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2077
Indices out of boundary when doing screening calculations
Hello, When I was doing the screening calculation (optdriver=3) using the spectral method (spmeth=1), I experienced the following errors. Anyone know how to get rid of it? --- !BUG src_file: m_chi0.F90 src_line: 2037 mpi_rank: 397 message: | Indices out of boundary my_wl = 3 iomegal = 2 my_wr = 126 ...
- Wed Mar 15, 2017 8:38 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5464
Re: Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
Hello Xiaoming, I did not notice the names of the files you attached, you can forget my previous answer then. My question now is, is the electron Hartree potential what you really wanted? If your goal is, for instance, to align the energy levels of the slab to vacuum, then you need the electrostati...
- Tue Mar 14, 2017 5:46 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5464
Re: Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
Hello Xiaoming, First of all, it seems that you used a large window for calculating the macroscopic average of the potential, is this what you wanted? A too large window would explain why the potential is not flat in the vacuum region, for most of the points in the vacuum region, the potential from...
- Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:00 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5464
Planar averaged Hartree potential [SOLVED]
Hello, I am trying to calculate the ionization potential of the perovskites. So I construct a slab with thickness around 24 Bohr and vacuum of 30 Bohr. In order to align the VBM with the vacuum level, I printed the Hartree potential by using prtvha=1. Then I use macroave to get the planar averaged v...
- Sat Jan 14, 2017 4:17 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: bug of state.F90 ? [SOLVED]
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3834
bug of state.F90 ? [SOLVED]
When I am doing nscf to get the wave function for a large number of bands, I came across the following error. So what does it mean and how to solve it? -------------------------- --- !BUG src_file: gstate.F90 src_line: 615 mpi_rank: 0 message: | Error: overflow of mcg integer for size of the full wf...
- Sat Jan 14, 2017 5:13 am
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: restart for sigma calculation
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2212
restart for sigma calculation
Dear all, Is it possible to restart during the Sigma step of the GW calculations? I am calculating a metallic system and want to obtain the corrected Fermi level. I am using very dense k points (9*9*1) and large number of bands (2000). That is quite time-consuming. However, the server I am using doe...
- Tue Nov 29, 2016 6:36 pm
- Forum: Many-body perturbation theory
- Topic: Memory use estimate in GW and BSE calculations
- Replies: 2
- Views: 7087
Re: Memory use estimate in GW and BSE calculations
Hi Matteo, I am interested in the develop version support for NC pseudos with more than one projector. How can I download this version? BTW, can you comment on the GW calculation using PAW? From the tutorial, for GW calculation, PAW with 3 projectors for each angular momentum channel is requited. Th...