Search found 15 matches
- Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:05 am
- Forum: Improving ABINIT
- Topic: DOS bug and inaccuracies
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5103
DOS bug and inaccuracies
Dear all, I just wanted to signal some problems with DOS and projected DOS. I use the last version of abinit with mpi parallelization. * When performing a projected dos in parallel mode, the number of integrated bands is something equals to nband*nprocs. See the attached picture (Tot-DOS = prtdos 2;...
- Mon Jun 01, 2015 10:24 am
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Cell Optimization problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3515
Re: Cell Optimization problem
Dear Pr. Zwanziger, Thank you for having taking the time to work on my problem. First of all, I want to precise that I use a 10 electron GGA pseudopotential for Ni, so 10 bands per atom was fine, I increased this number without seeing improvement so I came back to that initial number. I am not reall...
- Tue May 26, 2015 2:58 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Cell Optimization problem
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3515
Cell Optimization problem
Dear abiniters, I am encountering a little but quite annoying problem. I am performing a cell optimization within a HCP structure, that provides me relaxed cell parameters with a zeroed pressure (-1E-6 GPa). When I reuse these cell parameters and perform a static ground state calculation (just turn ...
- Mon Sep 01, 2014 3:24 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: udtset problem?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1912
udtset problem?
Dear all, While using udtset in combination with ndtset, I am encountering a problem. When udtset >= 10 (more than two digits) the tsmear parameter that I use as an electronic temperature, is set to its default value 0.04 Ha. Thus: tsmear1? 3.173d-08 tsmear2? 9.503d-04 tsmear3? 3.173d-03 tsmear4? 9....
- Tue Feb 25, 2014 5:42 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: paral_kgb error with negative value
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2311
Re: paral_kgb error with negative value
Thanks a lot, that is exactly what I wanted to know.
- Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:43 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: paral_kgb error with negative value
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2311
paral_kgb error with negative value
Dear all, I am using the last version of abinit (7.6.1) and the documentation is not available online, so I am still considering documentation of version 7.4. I want to use, the variable paral_kgb with negative values to evaluate optimal number of processors, which is very useful, however negative v...
- Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:00 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: processor distribution rules
- Replies: 0
- Views: 1562
processor distribution rules
Dear users, I am writing because I am facing efficiency problem. I can do massive parallel calculations, with a 2000 procs as a maximum and 6h/12h calculation times. Thus, I have to reach the highest efficiency as possible for my calculations. Here is an example of automatic distribution of processo...
- Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:20 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: DOS inaccuracies
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2306
DOS inaccuracies
Dear all, I think there is a little problem in the DOS files printed by Abinit. Maximum printed value is 9999.9999. Such high value should be fine for most of the electronic density of states, however it appeared to be a too low value when one considers semicore states. Here is a part of DOS file ob...
- Tue Jan 29, 2013 4:36 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Bug - Contact Abinit group
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2150
Re: Bug - Contact Abinit group
Hi Boris,
Hope you are going well.
Thank you for this useful information. I will follow your advice.
Best regards,
Emile
Hope you are going well.
Thank you for this useful information. I will follow your advice.
Best regards,
Emile
- Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:24 pm
- Forum: Ground state
- Topic: Bug - Contact Abinit group
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2150
Bug - Contact Abinit group
Dear abinitioners, I am currently doing molecular dynamic simulations in a parallel way. In order to distribute efficiently processors over the various possibilities (npkpt, npband etc..) I make a first run using the paral_kgb -nproc option. Then I consider only distributions with a weight equal to ...
- Tue Jan 15, 2013 4:07 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Improving phonon dispersion curves
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4995
Re: Improving phonon dispersion curves
Dear abiniters, I made phonon dispersion curves increasing K-points and Q-points as discussed with Simon. I got the expected phonon dispersion curve with a K-point grid of 16x16x16 and a Q-point grid of 4x4x4 (figure 1). When I increased the number of K-points to 20x20x20, I got an almost similar cu...
- Fri Dec 07, 2012 2:55 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Improving phonon dispersion curves
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4995
Re: Improving phonon dispersion curves
Dear Simon, Thank you for your quick answer. Since results look good with the first pseudopotential I though that such k-points grids should be fine. It is also much more time consuming, thus this is the only point I did not really test yet. Well, I used such dense k-points grid for GS calculation b...
- Fri Dec 07, 2012 1:02 pm
- Forum: Response calculations
- Topic: Improving phonon dispersion curves
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4995
Improving phonon dispersion curves
Dear all, From a long time now, I am trying to get nice phonon dispersion curves for simple metals in the simple FCC structure (primitive cell, rhomboedral structure). Using the tutorial provided on the abinit website, and using the provided Al pseudopotential (13al.981214.fhi), I can obtain the wan...
- Fri Dec 07, 2012 12:28 pm
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: TM pseudopotential segmentation fault with 7.0.3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8227
Re: TM pseudopotential segmentation fault with 7.0.3
Hello, More informations. Al being a metal, dataset 2 and 3 are not required. If I remove them, then response function calculations work correctly without any bugs. So for Al (metal): -abinit 6.12.3 RF calculations work with or without dataset 2&3. -abinit 7.0.3, RF calculations work only withou...
- Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:22 am
- Forum: Link to other codes
- Topic: TM pseudopotential segmentation fault with 7.0.3
- Replies: 5
- Views: 8227
Re: TM pseudopotential segmentation fault with 7.0.3
Dear abiniters As Yurtesen , I am also encountering a problem with abinit 7.0.3. I make a response function calculation according to the tutorial and it systematically failed at DATASET 3. Al GGA PAW atomic data were used in the first time. Then I came back to the use Al LDA PAW atomic data and I ma...