choosing ecut for geometry optimization

Total energy, geometry optimization, DFT+U, spin....

Moderator: bguster

Locked
maxim
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:17 pm
Location: Institute of Silicate Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

choosing ecut for geometry optimization

Post by maxim » Sat Dec 22, 2012 11:27 am

I have a general question.

If I want to perform geometry optimization, then in general I have to use toldfe 10-12, but for ecut, the convergence with accuracy within 1mHa is enough (or such accuracy can not be required)? Which test for ecut should be performed?

Best wishes, Maxim.
M.Yu. Arsent'ev
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
tikhonov_p-a@mail.ru

maxim
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:17 pm
Location: Institute of Silicate Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Re: choosing ecut for geometry optimization

Post by maxim » Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:25 am

I seem to understand it myself. To find out whether a particular etsut is enough for geometry optimization, I have to check convergence of forces in ecut, right?
M.Yu. Arsent'ev
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
tikhonov_p-a@mail.ru

User avatar
Alain_Jacques
Posts: 279
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:34 pm
Location: Université catholique de Louvain - Belgium

Re: choosing ecut for geometry optimization

Post by Alain_Jacques » Mon Feb 04, 2013 4:51 pm

Right ... there is no such a thing as a "good" ecut for any kind of pseudo. You have to check by yourself as for example in http://www.abinit.org/documentation/helpfiles/for-v7.0/tutorial/lesson_paw1.html

kind regards,

Alain

maxim
Posts: 78
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 1:17 pm
Location: Institute of Silicate Chemistry of Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

Re: choosing ecut for geometry optimization

Post by maxim » Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:42 am

Thank you very much, I will surely check it out
M.Yu. Arsent'ev
Institute of Silicate Chemistry of RAS
tikhonov_p-a@mail.ru

Locked