Hi all,
I want to optimize the 2D close packed phase of X-phenyl-dicarbonitril, without relaxing the molecules, but just their relative positions. Thus I have only one molecule in the box, and I use optcell 9, while fixing all atoms with iatfix. However, my atomic coordinates are perfectly symetric along x, y and z (sym Pmmm in a rectangular box), which should not be a pb, but I get the following error :
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
.Version 6.2.1 of ABINIT
.(sequential version, prepared for a i686_linux_gnu4.4 computer)
[...]
Symmetries : space group P2/m (# 10); Bravais mP (primitive monocl.)
[...]
fixsym: ERROR -
Atom number 34 is symmetrically equivalent to atom number 33,
but according to iatfix, iatfixx, iatfixy and iatfixz, they
are not fixed along the same directions, which is forbidden.
Action : modify either the symmetry or iatfix(x,y,z) and resubmit.
leave_new : decision taken to exit ...
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Which I don't understand since all the coordinates of all the atoms are fixed...
The only way to make the conputation continue is to artificialy break the symmetry, by manually changing a digit in the coordinates... I'm wondering if this is really intended...
Thanks for your comments...
Emmanuel
[SOLVED] fixsym: ERROR
Moderator: bguster
[SOLVED] fixsym: ERROR
- Attachments
-
- NC-Ph3-CN.in
- (3.66 KiB) Downloaded 450 times
Physikdepartemnt E20
Technische Universität München
James-Franck Straße 1
D-85748 Garching
Technische Universität München
James-Franck Straße 1
D-85748 Garching
Re: fixsym: ERROR
you inverted natfix and iatfix. The rest looks ok.
tell us if this works - I think no one has tried optcell with all atoms fixed before!
Matthieu
tell us if this works - I think no one has tried optcell with all atoms fixed before!
Matthieu
Matthieu Verstraete
University of Liege, Belgium
University of Liege, Belgium
Re: fixsym: ERROR
Stupid of me...
Thanks for pointing it out !
As for the results, it works just fine, except that the xcart at the end are not identical to the xcart at the beginning in the output file. But I'd say it's because of a change in lattice definition.
It's also pretty fast too !
Best regards,
Emmanuel
Thanks for pointing it out !
As for the results, it works just fine, except that the xcart at the end are not identical to the xcart at the beginning in the output file. But I'd say it's because of a change in lattice definition.
It's also pretty fast too !
Best regards,
Emmanuel
Physikdepartemnt E20
Technische Universität München
James-Franck Straße 1
D-85748 Garching
Technische Universität München
James-Franck Straße 1
D-85748 Garching