the problem of optimization of the lattice parameter ??

Total energy, geometry optimization, DFT+U, spin....

Moderator: bguster

Locked
hjli
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 1:45 pm

the problem of optimization of the lattice parameter ??

Post by hjli » Sun May 01, 2011 3:48 pm

Respected All,
I have recently learned abinit 6.4.3 for windows, there are three examples about optimization of the lattice parameter :
t34.# Crystalline silicon : computation of the optimal lattice parameter
# Convergence with respect to the number of k points.
t41..# Crystalline aluminum : optimization of the lattice parameter
# at fixed number of k points and broadening.
t42.# Crystalline silicon : computation of the optimal lattice parameter
# Convergence with respect to the number of k points.

Can anybody tell me what is the difference between them ?

the second problem:
could I use this .in file to optimize the lattice parameter of Si?

ndtset 15 # Number of data sets
acell: 9.6 9.6 9.6 # Initial acell
acell+ 0.1 0.1 0.1 # Interval of acell
kptopt 1 # Kpoint option ( default 0.0 )
ngkpt 6 6 6 # Number of k-points
toldfe 1.0d-6 # Tolerance on the difference of total energy
iscf 5 # SCF cycle, CG based on the minim. of the energy
nstep 15 # Number of self-consistent field steps
diemac 12.0 # Macroscopic dielectric constant diemac of the system
# is a useful help to speed-up the SCF procedure
ecut 9.0 # Energy cut off
enunit 2 # Energy unit of output
nband 5 # Number of bands
ixc 1 # Exchange Correlation choice
typat 1 1 # Number of types of atoms
znucl 14 # Atomic number of the atoms
natom 2
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # Lattice vector
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
xred 0.00 0.00 0.00 # Basic vector
0.25 0.25 0.25

with best regards
Attachments
t34.in
(2.63 KiB) Downloaded 360 times
t41.in
(2.17 KiB) Downloaded 359 times
t42.in
(1.98 KiB) Downloaded 317 times

Boris
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:13 am
Location: France

Re: the problem of optimization of the lattice parameter ??

Post by Boris » Mon May 02, 2011 5:13 pm

Hi

If you want to compute the optimal cell parameter, it is better to let abinit find it on its own. Therefore, you don't need to use any dataset involving a change in the cell parameter (namely, acell+ 0.1 0.1 0.1).

Instead, you should use the following keywords: IONMOV, NTIME, OPTCELL and TOLMXF

If you use these keywords, abinit will perform a geometry optimization and will provide you with the optimum cell parameters.

For your first question, I guess the differences should be explained in the tutorials.

Regards
----------------------------------------------------------
Boris Dorado
Atomic Energy Commission
France
----------------------------------------------------------

hjli
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 1:45 pm

Re: the problem of optimization of the lattice parameter ??

Post by hjli » Tue May 03, 2011 7:32 am

Thanks,
I have another problem,Before I optimize the lattice parameters(eg. ZnO), I must define the number of k-points(ngkpt) and the energy cut off (ecut), in which .in files the the lattice parameters are experimental results??

Boris
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:13 am
Location: France

Re: the problem of optimization of the lattice parameter ??

Post by Boris » Tue May 03, 2011 7:07 pm

Sorry but I don't understand your question

Boris
----------------------------------------------------------
Boris Dorado
Atomic Energy Commission
France
----------------------------------------------------------

Locked