Page 1 of 1
GW accurancy
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:26 pm
by Newlife1982
Hi all,
I do the GW calculations about crystal Si. The band gap is about 1.34 eV, which is not very good compared with the experimental value 1.17 eV and others calculated value 1.24 eV.
I increase the cutoff energy and use different gwcalctyp methods as well as different exchange functional. But the calculated values are also bigger than 1.34. I do not know what is wrong
with my calculations. Anybody know about it? It would be very nice if you could give me some advices. Thank you very much.
Re: GW accurancy
Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 2:58 pm
by bruneval
1.34 eV is not that bad.
Difficult to help you without your input files...
Fabien
Re: GW accurancy
Posted: Fri Jun 25, 2010 11:14 am
by Newlife1982
The input files are as follows. Thank you in advance for your reply.
# Create the KSS file
kssform 1
nbandkss 100
nband 100
prtwf 0
#Definition of occupation numbers
occopt 1
tsmear 0.01
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 3*10.259
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 1
znucl 14
#Definition of the atoms
natom 2
typat 1 1
xred 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.25 1.25 0.25
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 20.0
#Definition of the k-point grid
ngkpt 4 4 4
#64 k points
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0. 0. 0.
istwfk 8*1
#256 k points
#nshiftk 4
#shiftk 0 0 0 1/2 1/2 0 1/2 0 1/2 0 1/2 1/2
#istwfk 19*1
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 50
toldfe 1.0d-8
prtvol 5
enunit 1
.............................................................................................................................................
# create the screening file
#Parameter for the screening calculation
optdriver 3
gwcalctyp 28
nband 100
ecuteps 17.0
ecutwfn 17.0
nfreqim 4
nfreqre 10
freqremax 1.
awtr 0 # Note : the default awtr 1 is better
#Definition of occupation numbers
occopt 1
tsmear 0.05
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 3*10.259
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 1
znucl 14
#Definition of the atoms
natom 2
typat 1 1
xred 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.25 1.25 0.25
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 20.0
#Definition of the k-point grid
ngkpt 4 4 4
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0. 0. 0.
istwfk 8*1
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 50
toldfe 1.0d-8
prtvol 5
enunit 1
........................................................................................................................................
calculation of the quasi-particle Fermi energy
#Parameters for the GW calculation
optdriver 4
nband 100
ecutsigx 17
ecutwfn 17
gwcalctyp 28
nkptgw 8
kptgw
0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
0.250000 0.000000 0.000000
0.500000 0.000000 0.000000
0.250000 0.250000 0.000000
0.500000 0.250000 0.000000
-0.250000 0.250000 0.000000
0.500000 0.500000 0.000000
-0.250000 0.500000 0.250000
bdgw
1 50
1 50
1 50
1 50
1 50
1 50
1 50
1 50
#Definition of occupation numbers
occopt 1
tsmear 0.01
#Definition of the unit cell
acell 3*10.259
rprim 0.0 0.5 0.5 # FCC primitive vectors (to be scaled by acell)
0.5 0.0 0.5
0.5 0.5 0.0
#Definition of the atom types
ntypat 1
znucl 14
#Definition of the atoms
natom 2
typat 1 1
xred 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.25 1.25 0.25
#Definition of the planewave basis set
ecut 20.0
#Definition of the k-point grid
ngkpt 4 4 4
nshiftk 1
shiftk 0. 0. 0.
istwfk 8*1
#Definition of the SCF procedure
nstep 50
toldfe 1.0d-8
prtvol 5
enunit 1
Re: GW accurancy
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:43 pm
by bruneval
Your k-point set appears a bit too small. Try to increase it.
Fabien
Re: GW accurancy
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2010 4:59 pm
by Newlife1982
Fabien:
Thank you very much. I am trying the new K-point.
Wang
Re: GW accurancy
Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2012 10:37 pm
by Steve
You really use 1.25?
xred 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.25 1.25 0.25
Best regards, Steve.