Page 1 of 1

anisotropic dielectric function

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:57 am
by raul_l
Dear users,
How can I define the electric field direction of the incident light for my dielectric function calculation? In the experiment the crystal is excited perpendicular to the ac-plane, c being the optical axis, and therefore two polarization directions should be distinguished. Some of the relevant keywords for Abinit input are

iscf -3
nline 0
nqpt 1
qpt 0.0 0.0 0.0
rfelfd 2
rfdir1 1 0 0
rfdir2 0 1 0 # For the ac-plane I think only this direction is enough
rfdir3 0 0 1

and for the Optic input

0.002 ! Value of the smearing factor, in Hartree
0.0003 0.74 ! Difference between frequency values (in Hartree), and maximum frequency
0.055 ! Scissor shift if needed, in Hartree
0.002 ! Tolerance on closeness of singularities (in Hartree)
3 ! Number of components of linear optic tensor to be computed
11 22 33 ! Linear coefficients to be computed (x=1, y=2, z=3)
0 ! Number of components of nonlinear optic tensor to be computed

What should I add/change to include anisotropy? Is the incident light considered unpolarized by default?
Thank you

Re: anisotropic dielectric function

Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:31 pm
by raul_l
Ok, let me ask this. If I shine light on the ac-plane of my sample such that the electric field is parallel to the c-axis, is the c-axis the direction of perturbation, i.e. rfdir 0 0 1? What is the physical meaning of rfdir in the dielectric function calculation?

Re: anisotropic dielectric function

Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2012 10:37 pm
by mverstra
you should always use rfdir 1 1 1 which means calculate all perturbations (x y z). The optic output should be tensorial, and hence anisotropic.

What you have added rfdir1 rfdir2 etc... are for different datasets, but this is not necessary.

M.

Re: anisotropic dielectric function

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:43 am
by raul_l
Thank you for the answer. I now see that it is indeed safer to always use rfdir 1 1 1. Although for the given case (exciting the ac-plane of the crystal with light polarized in the c-direction) using just rfdir 0 0 1 produces the same result so my discussion above should be basically correct.