Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Phonons, DFPT, electron-phonon, electric-field response, mechanical response…

Moderators: mverstra, joaocarloscabreu

Locked
hhwj340
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 10:42 am

Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by hhwj340 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 3:50 pm

Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Boris
Posts: 128
Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:13 am
Location: France

Re: Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by Boris » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:39 pm

Hi

Not yet. But should be available soon, I guess.
----------------------------------------------------------
Boris Dorado
Atomic Energy Commission
France
----------------------------------------------------------

Robin
Posts: 61
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:18 am

Re: Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by Robin » Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:19 am

PAW can be used in the linear optical response calculation and gives almost the same converged results as NCP according to my tests. I find using PAW reduce the CPU time only a little but the memory consumption a lot.

Sincerely,
Guangfu Luo

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by jzwanzig » Fri Jun 24, 2011 10:31 pm

In abinit-6.6.3, the official release, electric field and phonons are working for DFPT with PAW. We are finding the electric field code to be working very well and are getting very nice results with it. I have not done as much with the phonon code yet but at the Gamma point it is certainly working very well.
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

proffess
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 4:39 pm

Re: Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by proffess » Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:34 pm

Dear Developers,

Is it correct that in the current version of Abinit (6.8.1) one cannot combine PAW and GGA functionals (like PBEsol, AM05) to compute phonons?

Thanks.

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: Can PAW method be used in response calculation?

Post by jzwanzig » Wed Jul 06, 2011 12:31 pm

Yes, it is correct, it appears to be still limited to LDA.
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

Locked