symmetry problem in GW approximation by ABINIT

GW, Bethe-Salpeter …

Moderators: maryam.azizi, bruneval

Locked
amiri
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Location: Leoben-Austria

symmetry problem in GW approximation by ABINIT

Post by amiri » Mon May 30, 2011 11:54 am

Dear all users
As every one knows the band structure of graphene has a touching in the cone point (Dirac point) that this touching should be preserved by GW correction.
I applied the GW approximation on the graphene sheet. when i apply the GW on the normal hexagonal cell of graphene with two atom in the unit cell, i received a converge behaviour for GW gap versus k-mesh at the Dirac point. It should be mentioned that in this case i have a 24 symmetry operators for the system. But when i construct the supercell of graphene (1*2 cell) with four atoms in the cell the symmetry operators reduced to 4. In this case the primitive unit cell is a rectangular not hexagonal and i received strange manner for GW band gap at the Dirac point and i never received touching (or near touching) at the Dirac point by GW approximation. In each case LDA yields a good touching at the Dirac point.

"I think that this problem is only due to the symmetry and i think that ABINIT code is not symmetrized well and there is a bug in the code."

I attached to this e-mail the plots of band gap variation versus k-mesh at the Dirac-point for the normal cell and super-cell of graphene-sheet.
and i also attach one of my input file for GW correction on the super-cell of graphene sheet.
Any suggestions will be appreciated.
Peiman
Attachments
report1.png
report2.png
graphene-sheet-1_2-gw.in
(5.61 KiB) Downloaded 338 times

bruneval
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 11:38 am

Re: symmetry problem in GW approximation by ABINIT

Post by bruneval » Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:36 am

It seems to be related to the convergence vs k-points.
The converge of the exact exchange vs k-points is noticeably slower than the convergence of LDA.
A way to improve the convergence is to use a truncated Coulomb interaction as proposed by Spencer and Alavi in their PRB.
Could you make a try using

Code: Select all

icutcoul  0
rcut      -1.0

?

Locked