fcc Fe, antiferromagnetic lattice definition, tspin_2.in
Posted: Wed Dec 06, 2017 4:03 am
The tspin_2.in and tspin_3.in tutorials for AF fcc Fe both have this:
rprim
0.5 -0.5 0.0
0.5 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0 0.5
spinat
0.0 0.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 -4.0
I might be wrong but it seems like for atom 2 xred should be 0.5 0.5 0.5. Or were these intended to be xcart values? I'm thinking about this in a picture where the xyz coordinates line up with the conventional cell. Then all of the positions of the fcc lattice are generated. But that symmetry suggests FM nearest neighbors, which must be wrong. Maybe that's accounted for with the Shubnikov symmetries, however in tspin_3.in, the Shubnikov symmetries aren't used, and the cell parameters have not changed.
Plus when I look at what is given by the tutorial, I can't seem to generate all of the fcc lattice points, regardless of whether they're FM or AF.
Anyway, I hope the above is correct, because I don't see an easy way to create an AF fcc lattice. I suppose this is related to the Shubnikov. If so, could I get a reference to something good about this?
Thanks if you can clear this up. Take care. -Ryan
rprim
0.5 -0.5 0.0
0.5 0.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 1.0
xred
0.0 0.0 0.0
0.5 0.0 0.5
spinat
0.0 0.0 4.0
0.0 0.0 -4.0
I might be wrong but it seems like for atom 2 xred should be 0.5 0.5 0.5. Or were these intended to be xcart values? I'm thinking about this in a picture where the xyz coordinates line up with the conventional cell. Then all of the positions of the fcc lattice are generated. But that symmetry suggests FM nearest neighbors, which must be wrong. Maybe that's accounted for with the Shubnikov symmetries, however in tspin_3.in, the Shubnikov symmetries aren't used, and the cell parameters have not changed.
Plus when I look at what is given by the tutorial, I can't seem to generate all of the fcc lattice points, regardless of whether they're FM or AF.
Anyway, I hope the above is correct, because I don't see an easy way to create an AF fcc lattice. I suppose this is related to the Shubnikov. If so, could I get a reference to something good about this?
Thanks if you can clear this up. Take care. -Ryan