ETOT in phonon calculations

Phonons, DFPT, electron-phonon, electric-field response, mechanical response…

Moderators: mverstra, joaocarloscabreu

Locked
gryko
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:56 pm

ETOT in phonon calculations

Post by gryko » Fri May 24, 2013 3:38 am

Hello,

Could you help me to understand why ETOT is jumping so much in phonon calculations? I just run trf2_x. example and in the first run
ETOT ~ -9.7 Ha but then it jumps to large positive values for different q-vectors.

Thank you,

Jan Gryko

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: ETOT in phonon calculations

Post by jzwanzig » Fri May 24, 2013 12:30 pm

Because the total energy (ETOT) has different meanings in the different calculations. In the first run, ETOT is the total ground state energy. In the phonon runs, what is being calculated (and represented by ETOT) is the second derivative of the energy with respect to the perturbation being done to the system. Thus there's no reason they should be similar in these two very different contexts.
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

gryko
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: ETOT in phonon calculations

Post by gryko » Fri May 24, 2013 3:58 pm

Thank you very much for quick answer. Perfectly clear.

JG

gryko
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:56 pm

Convergence in phonon calculations

Post by gryko » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:33 pm

In phonon calculations, the ETOT quantity (which is, as pointed out by Prof. Zwanziger, is the second derivative with respect to the perturbation) converges very quickly. But the square of density/potential residues converges much more slowly. Question: Is it OK to get convergence in ETOT only, since what we need are second derivatives? If so, can I use toldfe instead of tolvrs?

Thank you,
JG

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: ETOT in phonon calculations

Post by jzwanzig » Tue Jun 11, 2013 5:43 pm

Well, I guess you could try it this way but it is not recommended--much safer to use tolvrs with moderate convergence, say 1D-8 or 1D-10.
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

Locked