optimization and evaluation of results in the GW calculation
Posted: Wed Aug 03, 2011 5:30 pm
Dear friends,
I run two structures with the GW approximation. The first results,
E^0_gap 0.280
E^GW_gap 0.001
DeltaE^GW_gap -0.277
in this case, can we say this structure show metallic properties with GW and this structure has semiconductor band gap without GW?
next results,
E^0_gap 0.691
E^GW_gap -0.166
DeltaE^GW_gap -0.857
GW_gap is negative, in this case, can we say this structure certainly has metallic properties?
Finally, I examine first tutorial on GW, there is an explanation in the convergence studies in the tutorial,
---can be considered converged within 0.01eV.
which the 0.01 eV value represents the difference between the parameters?
I run two structures with the GW approximation. The first results,
E^0_gap 0.280
E^GW_gap 0.001
DeltaE^GW_gap -0.277
in this case, can we say this structure show metallic properties with GW and this structure has semiconductor band gap without GW?
next results,
E^0_gap 0.691
E^GW_gap -0.166
DeltaE^GW_gap -0.857
GW_gap is negative, in this case, can we say this structure certainly has metallic properties?
Finally, I examine first tutorial on GW, there is an explanation in the convergence studies in the tutorial,
---can be considered converged within 0.01eV.
which the 0.01 eV value represents the difference between the parameters?