ixc compatibility?

Total energy, geometry optimization, DFT+U, spin....

Moderator: bguster

Locked
iamikaruk
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 4:40 am

ixc compatibility?

Post by iamikaruk » Thu Jun 30, 2011 8:05 am

Dear all
I'm using the Teter's extended norm-conserving PP (pspxc=1) and the T-M PPs (pspxc=2) for response function calculations. Certainly I got WARNINGs complaining that I should change my PPs for the ixc consistency. In the BASIC variables, it had been mentioned that "the choices ixc=1, 2, 3 and 7 are fits to the same data, from Ceperley-Alder, and are rather similar, at least for spin-unpolarized systems." So my question is is it safe to ignore these WARNINGs? :mrgreen: Thank you very much!
L. Xie

Locked