Hi abinit users,
I was trying to relax monolayer of In2Se3.
The output file shows that the reduced relax coordinates are far off from the one in input files.
Could you please figure out my error in my input files?
lattice parameters and reduced coordinates are as follows
rprim
6.5887536421 3.8040186889 0.0000000000000000
-6.5887536421 3.8040186889 0.0000000000000000
0.0000000000 0.0000000000 66.140414361901960
typat
1 1 2 2 2
xred
0.6666666666666666 0.3333333333333333 0.14020000000000
0.6666666666666666 0.3333333333333333 0.32880000000000
0.6666666666666666 0.3333333333333333 0.05450000000000
0.3333333333333333 0.6666666666666666 0.18100000000000
0.0000000000000000 0.0000000000000000 0.28220000000000
The output files shows their values as
xred 6.6666666667E-01 3.3333333333E-01 -2.1545480934E-01
6.6666666667E-01 3.3333333333E-01 8.4324516268E-01
6.6666666667E-01 3.3333333333E-01 -2.8344394402E-01
3.3333333333E-01 6.6666666667E-01 1.7956903120E-01
-1.4802973662E-16 -3.7007434154E-17 4.6278455936E-01
Thanking in advance.
Best regards,
Suman
structural optimization of monolayer In2Se3
Moderator: bguster
structural optimization of monolayer In2Se3
- Attachments
-
- in2se3.in
- (1.83 KiB) Downloaded 385 times
-
- in2se3.out
- (443.58 KiB) Downloaded 356 times
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2020 3:16 am
Re: structural optimization of monolayer In2Se3
I have similar problems with you. When I calculate two dimensional systems such as GeSe, SnSe, and SnTe, the outputted forces are extremely large. The structures used have already been optimized with VASP or Quantum Espresso codes.
For other 3D systems, Abinit can always get consistent results with VASP or Quantum Espresso.
For other 3D systems, Abinit can always get consistent results with VASP or Quantum Espresso.