PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

External optional components of Abinit (BigDFT, Wannier90...) and codes using/providing data from/to Abinit (AtomPAW, ONCVPSP, EXC, DP, Yambo...)

Moderators: ebousquet, bxu

Locked
gildardo
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:25 am
Location: Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico

PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

Post by gildardo » Fri Aug 26, 2011 11:33 pm

Hello, this is my first post in the forum.

I'm relatively new doing PAW calculations. I have a question regarding crystal symmetries and the atomic basis: is the value of ecut dependent on them? Specifically for convergence of Etotal.

What I mean, do crystals with more complex symmetry (than, say, cubic symmetry), or those with more atoms in the basis require higher values for ecut? (Or for that matter, higher pawecutdg?) I mean, is a value of ecut higher than 30 hartree too high, say for example the ferroelectric LiNbO3 crystal?

Any advice would be welcome, and thank you in advance.
Gildardo Rivas
Departamento de Física y Matemáticas
Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Juárez, Chihuahua, México

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

Post by jzwanzig » Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:26 pm

Welcome to the forum! Ecut depends on the PAW datasets, not on the complexity of the unit cell. Generally speaking, light atoms will need higher ecut's than heavy atoms, and also, the lightest atom in the sample will determine ecut for the whole sample (that is, you could have a bunch of heavy atoms and only a single light atom, and you will still have to use a large ecut due to the single light atom). So something like LiNbO3 will need a high ecut because of Li and O, not because of cell size. You could do some kind of As-Se glass alloy with a huge supercell, and need only a very small ecut because of the properties of As and Se. Of course, there would still be many bands and it would be a big calculation, but not because of ecut!

Hope this helps--
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

gildardo
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:25 am
Location: Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico

Re: PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

Post by gildardo » Mon Aug 29, 2011 11:31 pm

Thank you for your reply! And yes, it does help. I prepared some data sets for Li, O, and Nb (*not* with a Bloechl but rather a Vanderbilt scheme for pseudization) for a calculation on LiNbO3, and when I realized I needed and Ecut higher than 40 hartree to achieve convergence on the order of 1 part in 10^6 in the total cell energy I tought I might be doing something wrong. I guess I'll have to live with it hehe :)

Again, thank you very much.
Gildardo Rivas
Departamento de Física y Matemáticas
Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Juárez, Chihuahua, México

User avatar
jzwanzig
Posts: 504
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 9:25 am

Re: PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

Post by jzwanzig » Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:02 pm

40 Ha is very high. For O and Li you should be able to get to 20 Ha, though it is hard to get much lower. My general experience is that "custom rrkj" works best for main group atoms, and "custom polynom2 7 10 vanderbiltortho besselshape" works best for transition metals.
Josef W. Zwanziger
Professor, Department of Chemistry
Canada Research Chair in NMR Studies of Materials
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS B3H 4J3 Canada
jzwanzig@gmail.com

gildardo
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:25 am
Location: Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico

Re: PAW, crytal symmetries, atomic basis and Ecut

Post by gildardo » Tue Aug 30, 2011 9:27 pm

Thank you once again. I will certainly try your suggestion, since I did think it was a bit high at 40
Gildardo Rivas
Departamento de Física y Matemáticas
Instituto de Ingeniería y Tecnología
Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez
Juárez, Chihuahua, México

Locked